Why Internal Consulting Deserves Strategic Attention

Gokhan Turgut, Ph.D., Adm.A., CMC

CMC Global/ICMCI Academic Fellow (CMC-AF)

turgut.gokhan@uqam.ca

Internal management consulting is a critical yet underappreciated function in modern organizations. While external consulting has long dominated both academic literature and professional practice, internal consulting is gaining traction due to its unique ability to deliver context-sensitive, cost-effective, and strategically aligned solutions. This shift reflects a growing recognition—among scholars and practitioners alike—that internal consultants are not just operational support, but strategic actors embedded within the organization.

Despite its increasing relevance, internal consulting remains underexamined and often misunderstood. Professionals face a knowledge gap: how do internal consultants differ from external ones, and what value do they truly offer? This blog addresses that gap, translating academic insights into practical takeaways. It explores the definition, structure, comparative advantages, and strategic rationale behind internal consulting, offering professionals a clearer understanding of how to leverage this capability for long-term success.

The Strategic Value of Internal Management Consulting

Internal management consulting is increasingly common in large organizations across both public and private sectors, offering tailored expertise and strategic insights grounded in organizational context [1]. These consultants typically focus on operational efficiency, organizational development, project and strategic management, and HR functions [2].

Consulting is traditionally viewed as a specialized profession, where external experts provide objective advice to solve complex problems [3]. However, another perspective sees consulting as a role that any skilled individual—such as a manager—can adopt by offering guidance and support internally [4]. These two views often coexist, depending on organizational context [2]. As organizations face increasing complexity, internal consultants are well-positioned to drive change from within, combining technical expertise with deep organizational knowledge.

Understanding Internal Management Consulting

Internal management consultants—also known as in-house consultants or consultant managers—are full-time employees who provide advisory and implementation support within their own organizations [5][6]. Unlike external consultants, they report to senior managers and possess deep knowledge of internal culture, processes, and power dynamics [7][8].

However, their role goes beyond offering advice. Internal consultants often help implement solutions, making their contributions more sustainable and aligned with organizational realities [8]. Their structures vary widely—from small, embedded teams to large, autonomous units—and they may serve internal departments or external partners [9].

Schein’s framework (1988) outlines three key roles internal consultants may adopt [4]:

• Process Consultant: Facilitates problem-solving led by the client.
• Expert Consultant: Diagnoses and recommends solutions based on specialized knowledge.
• Pair-of-Hands Consultant: Implements solutions already defined by the client.

These roles reflect the flexibility and strategic importance of internal consultants in driving change and supporting decision-making across diverse organizational contexts.

Internal vs. External Consulting

Management consulting literature has traditionally emphasized external consultants and firms [10], while internal consulting remains comparatively underexplored [11]. Yet, both play distinct and complementary roles within organizations.

External consultants are typically engaged for short-term, project-based work across various industries. Their outsider status allows them to challenge assumptions and introduce innovative practices drawn from diverse contexts [12]. Internal consultants, by contrast, are full-time employees embedded within the organization. Their deep familiarity with internal culture, processes, and politics enables them to offer highly tailored and actionable advice [13].

Their reputation and costs also differ. External consultants often carry prestigious credentials and market visibility, enhancing their perceived credibility [14]. Internal consultants build trust through long-term relationships but may lack external recognition. Financially, internal consultants are generally more cost-effective, making them ideal for ongoing or resource-intensive initiatives [15].

Their expertise also varies. External consultants are valued for their broad exposure and strategic insights [16], while internal consultants offer deep contextual intelligence and access to organizational memory—critical for sustainable change [17].

Furthermore, internal consultants are preferred for politically sensitive or confidential projects requiring discretion. External consultants, on the other hand, are ideal when objectivity or disruptive innovation is needed, such as performance reviews or strategic transformations [18].

Ultimately, both types of consultants offer unique strengths. Internal consultants ensure alignment and implementation, while external consultants challenge norms and introduce fresh perspectives. Organizations benefit most when they leverage both, depending on context and strategic goals.

The Importance of Internal Consulting

The rise of internal consulting reflects growing dissatisfaction with external consulting services, which are often seen as too academic or disconnected from real organizational challenges [19]. Internal consultants, by contrast, offer context-specific insights grounded in deep organizational knowledge, making their recommendations more practical and actionable.

Academic research on management consultancy highlights several strategic advantages of internal consulting [2][5][9][10][13][18][20][21]:

• Cost Efficiency – Internal consultants deliver similar value at a lower cost, making them ideal for long-term support.
• Strategic Alignment – Their familiarity with organizational goals ensures that advice supports the broader vision.
• Enhanced Responsiveness – Embedded in daily operations, internal consultants offer timely support and foster collaboration.
• Change Enablement – Their dual role in advising and implementing facilitates smoother transitions.
• Cross-Team Coordination – Internal consultants help align efforts across departments, improving strategic execution.
• Knowledge Mobilization – They centralize and share critical insights, accelerating decision-making and preserving institutional memory.
• Creativity and Innovation – By connecting teams, they promote idea exchange and problem-solving.
• Political Navigation – Their insider status allows them to anticipate resistance and manage internal dynamics effectively.
• Tailored Solutions – Internal consultants design context-sensitive strategies that fit the organization’s unique environment.
• Streamlined Implementation – Their involvement in execution ensures realistic, adaptable solutions.
• Revenue Generation – When capacity allows, internal consultants can offer services externally, adding financial value.

Bridging the Gap Between Strategy and Execution

In conclusion, the growing reliance on internal consultants reflects a deeper organizational challenge: external consulting, at times, fails to deliver solutions that are actionable, affordable, and aligned with internal realities. Many organizations struggle with implementing externally proposed strategies that lack contextual relevance and long-term sustainability.

The solution lies in recognizing and investing in internal consulting as a strategic function. Internal consultants offer embedded expertise, political fluency, and implementation capacity that external consultants often lack. They are uniquely positioned to drive change, foster collaboration, and translate strategy into execution. By integrating internal consultants into both planning and delivery, organizations can overcome the disconnect between vision and reality.

To remain competitive, organizations must move beyond viewing internal consulting as a cost-saving alternative. Instead, they should see it as a strategic asset—one that enhances agility, innovation, and resilience. This shift requires not just structural support, but a cultural recognition of the value internal consultants bring to the table.

References

1. CMC. (2009). Management consulting in Canada: Industry overview. Canadian Association of Management Consultants.
2. Sturdy, A., Wright, C., & Wylie, N. (2016). Management as consultancy: Neo-bureaucracy and the consultant manager. Cambridge University Press.
3. Greiner, L. E., & Metzger, R. O. (1983). Consulting to management. Prentice-Hall.
4. Schein, E. H. (1988). Process consultation: Volume I. Addison-Wesley.
5. Schumacher, T., & Scherzinger, M. (2016). In-house consulting: A literature review.
6. Sturdy, A., Handley, K., Clark, T., & Fincham, R. (2015). Management consultancy and organizational uncertainty.
7. Lacey, W. (1995). Internal consultants: Roles, responsibilities, and organizational positioning.
8. Buono, A. F., & Subbiah, K. (2014). Internal consultants as change agents.
9. Grima, F., & Trépo, G. (2011). Internal consulting in organizations: Structures and practices.
10. Buono, A. F. (2015). Consulting challenges and opportunities in a complex world. Information Age Publishing.
11. Sturdy, A., & Wylie, N. (2011). Internal and external consultants in the management of change: Knowledge, power and boundaries. New Technology, Work and Employment, 26(1), 40–53.
12. Ramsden, P., & Bennett, R. J. (2005). External consultancy and knowledge transfer. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 23(1), 147–163.
13. Armstrong, M. (1992). Human resource management: Strategy and action. Kogan Page.
14. Manville, G., Greatbanks, R., Krishnasamy, R., & Parker, D. W. (2018). Critical success factors for internal consultants. Journal of Management Development, 37(2), 165–180.
15. Baaij, M. G. (2014). An introduction to management consultancy. SAGE Publications.
16. Kubr, M. (2002). Management consulting: A guide to the profession (4th ed.). International Labour Office.
17. Mottram, B. (2016). Organizational memory and internal consulting. Routledge.
18. Kenton, B., & Yarnall, J. (2012). Internal consultancy: Delivering value. Pearson Education.
19. Armbrüster, T. (2006). The economics and sociology of management consulting. Cambridge University Press.
20. Anand, N., Gardner, H. K., & Morris, T. (2007). Knowledge-based innovation: Emergence and embedding of new practice areas in management consulting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 406–428.
21. Anderson, D. L. (2012). Organization development: The process of leading organizational change. SAGE Publications.